The landscape of operating systems and databases has changed a bit in the last few years. I've been wondering about others' preferences on a few things. I mentioned how there was an employment opportunity that was pretty much guaranteed to me. I have made a post here before talking about issues I was having at work and having my job essentially changed overnight into something I don't like. Wish me luck with a new career opportunity IT & Tech Careers.I'd suggest to a) virtualize your SQL Server workload b) go Veeam. your current backup process isn't perfect (at best): too many manual steps, no increments, no sandboxing etc. Keep 3 copies of your data: primary set, on-site backup (separate silo of storage, NOT an extra LUN for your cluster) and some off-site copy (or copies). It could just be a piece of software that communicates directly from the hosted servers to our LAN, maybe via https or ftp, but it would be nice to install something like dropbox that does it all seemlessly, doesn't die regularly and doesn't hog cpu.Īll ideas and alternative thinking welcome ! So I'm now looking for alternatives that can copy this stuff around. dropbox keeps dying, so we have to log in often to check its running and restart it dropbox exe is often taking 5% cpu on a low end (8 core) server, I think thats excessive However in these days of dropbox technology the above model has us renting out a server unnecessarily, so we've been testing dropbox as a replacement, where we simply zip the backups to a dropbox connected folder and then it replicates to our LAN directly. The model we use currently is that we backup our sql databases to disk, zip them up and copy them off via FTP to another server, and from there back to our LAN so our customer's data is backed up nicely in a couple of places. Well actually four servers which run our SAAS service.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |